Emerging Media Demystified. From Upshot Interactive.


Archive for the ‘Social Media’ Category


Now how much would you pay? Investing in Facebook content.

funnelOne of the topics talked about ad nausea in online marketing circles is measuring social media ROI. Another topic of equal weight is building your Facebook Fan base. For obvious reasons, the more Fans, the more of an audience you have to talk (and let’s face it, by “talk” I mean “market”) to, and more people who will share those messages with others.

If you look at your Fan Base as a group of individuals who have opted-in to receive messaging from you, beginning to calculate ROI becomes easier. For example, if you bought a list of people who fit your target demographic, you might pay anywhere from $5 to $100 CPM depending on the quality of the list.  I’d peg Facebook Fans as premium simply because A) they’re willing to receive messaging from you once they are a Fan and B) because there’s a greater likelihood for that message to go viral.

One of the ways to build a Fan base, and keep them engaged is to invest in building a Facebook App to integrate into your Facebook Fan Pages.  In a recent Forester study, it was reported that 55% of tweens and 42% of adults want to see social applications from their favorite brands. Audiences are definitely there, and willing to interact with quality applications from brands they use, follow and admire.

Facebook application development runs the gamut. We’ve done apps for less than $10K, all the way towards $100K. Let’s assume you invest $5K to initially create your Fan Page (anyone can create a Fan Page free-of-charge, but we’re taking the leap you’re investing a little in an agency to design and configure something nice), and then later add a Facebook App at a cost of $20K, you can establish an ROI funnel to measure the impact the total investment ($25,000) adds to your bottom line over time. So an ROI plan and funnel may take the shape of:

  1. Correlate expansion in Fans to app usage/adoption
  2. Send messaging to Fans that includes links to specials, coupons, etc. via your Fan Pages Wall (which subsequently appears on Fans Newsfeeds)
  3. Measure click-throughs on links, and ultimately, conversions
  4. Calculate cost-per-conversion against total Facebook investment
  5. Calculate direct sales from Facebook

Based on this, let’s assume Brand X builds a Fan Base of 50,000 people, and sends out specials once a week. From this, 5% click-through and 20% convert.  Extrapolated over 12 weeks, (assuming 500 conversions per week), that becomes a cost per conversion of $4.17 if measured over a 3 month time span. With a Fan Base of 250,000 we get as low as 83 cents—not even considering repeat business.

However, this assumes that things remain static, and in social media, it’s anything but. Inevitably, you aren’t starting out with 50,000 fans, and over 12 weeks, the Fan Base may grow past 50,000. Also consider some of your messaging may reach people (through social sharing) that aren’t Fans. As more time passes, as long as your conversion percentages remain consistent, and your Fan Base grows, your conversions costs get exponentially lower.

This last part, really, is one of the primary reasons to invest in Facebook Apps and Facebook Fan Page content. Chances are pay-per-click campaigns on Google will only rise in conversion costs, not go lower. What other online marketing medium around today can you identify where your cost per conversion falls the longer you market? Email? Well, maybe, but let’s face it, email is tired and attrition is high. SEO? Yes, but you should be doing that anyway. Twitter? Sure—same principles apply, but users are only engaged through your messages, not content they can interact with.

While investment in Facebook Development is front-loaded, it pays off the longer you stay engaged and relevant to your fans. Additionally, some agencies (ourselves included) create arrangements where development can be paid over time, so that ROI can be realized more quickly, and in parallel to development fees. We predict once the Facebook Gold Rush settles, more agencies and marketing departments will adopt similar ROI calculation models, further justifying investment in the platform.

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


Worst. Quiz. Ever.

sharkWho doesn’t like a good online quiz? Take a leftover from Web 1.0, add a dash of social networking, and it would seem quizzes are the hottest thing online.

Of course, we all complain we’re inundated with Facebook quizzes, but hell, we all take them now and again right? These quizzes help broadcast our personality, provide a sense of voyeurism into our Friend’s lives, and create a distraction from, well, the economy for one. They are also an easy way for brands to create content for Fans (see our last post).

Which brings me to (insert Simpson’s Comic Book Guy voice), the Worst. Quiz. Ever.

Last night kicked off Discovery Channel’s Shark Week 2009, and Emerge designer extraordinaire Josh Webb turned me on to the “What Type of Shark Are You?” quiz, found on the Discovery Website promoting, you guessed it, the ever-popular Shark Week. I hesitate to even share the URL, but to truly get a sense of a quiz so horrific I would rather take the What Mr. Belvidere Character Are You? Quiz (doesn’t really exist) you can check it out at:
http://dsc.discovery.com/sharks/what-kind-of-shark-are-you-quiz.html

Let’s break down this marvel of Web technology:

  1. The quiz looks like it was designed, and written, by a high school student.
  2. It asks TEN (yes, 10) completely nonsensical multiple-choice questions about your life, and to prolong the pain, actually provides a “witty” summary after you answer each one, making the time to take this “fun” quiz excruciatingly long.
  3. The questions are accompanied by some the worst stock photography ever. It looks like they bought a stock photography CD from 1996 and used every photo on it, along with attributing each photo in the quiz to Getty Images. (Did Getty pay for this mention? Were the photos so expensive Discovery had to get Getty to subsidize the project?)  C’mon you are THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL! How about some really freakin’ cool pictures of sharks or even what they eat? Better yet, how about a few badass videos of a Great White jumping out of the water in between answers? I realize the point is to show pictures that are associated with the questions, but really, do we need to see a picture of a “sensitive guy” when we’re asked about well, whether we’re sensitive? We get it.
  4. The results make zero sense and I’m pretty convinced it’s flawed. The quiz tries to take your answers and summarize them in the form of whatever shark you happen to be; however, the responses did not match the answers I gave. In fact, Josh, his wife, and myself were all Hammerhead Sharks. This leads me to believe all results are, you guessed it: Hammerhead Sharks.
  5. You can’t share the results. I can’t post my results to Facebook, invite my friends, or even email them. Yes, the page has the standard “Share” button on it, but this is likely simply because it’s part of Discovery Channel’s sitewide template.

OK, I realize I’m picking on Discovery Channel, but like every other red-blooded American, who doesn’t like Shark Week? For shame. Admittedly, I have no idea when this quiz was created. For all I know, this quiz was created in 1996, by an intern before social sharing existed, and the idea of using good content to help promote your brand—in this case, Shark Week, was commonsense. Maybe they are just repurposing old stuff.

However, the quiz is featured right on the Shark Week homepage, and, like I said, it is…um…Shark Week right now. Summary? Just another fine example of putting up content for the sake of content, and alienating your fans.

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


The Social Media Marketer’s Glossary. Part 1: A – D

Doing some sort of Web 2.0, social media glossary for marketers is an idea we’ve been kicking around for sometime. With so many terms getting tossed around and created almost daily, tracking social media can be dizzying. While there are tons of glossaries out there for social media (Google it, or better yet, Bing it), we thought one dedicated to marketers would be a welcome addition.

Obviously, it would be easy to go overboard with something like this, so before we began we created some ground rules:

  1. Avoid defining ridiculously well known terms like “Blogs” or “Social Networks.” Forgive us if some of our choices are still a little obvious.
  2. Don’t define companies directly. Defining a service within a company, like “Facebook Fan Pages” for example is OK. Specific software is OK too.
  3. Add a  “Benefit to Marketers” statement with each listing, where applicable. It’s all about you guys right?

Over the next week or two, we’ll publish the full glossary, culminating in offering it as a PDF for download, or maybe a Wiki. So with that…

A

AIR: stands for Adobe Integrated Runtime, a technology that allows people to take web code (think Flash, Flex, HTML/Javascript/CSS) and deploy it as a desktop application. Tweetdeck, a popular desktop Twitter client was built using Adobe AIR.
Benefit to Marketers: an effective way to get your content portable and out of the competition of a web browser into a dedicated application that can stay top of mind with its users.

Advergame: see “Branded Games/Entertainment” below.

Avatar: the picture or icon one uses to represent themselves online, predominantly on social networking sites.
Benefit to Marketers: think avatars, think branding. As you represent your brand(s) through social networks, your avatar is an important brand element. Think about how it appears to others. Is it legible? Is it recognizable?

Authenticity: being true to yourself (i.e. your brand) and your customers when using social media. Some of the biggest social media marketing train wrecks have occurred when marketers weren’t completely transparent and authentic.
Benefit to Marketers: isn’t it obvious?

B

Blidget: “WTF is a Blidget?” That’s exactly what we said too when we first heard the term. Quite simply a Blidget is a widget that displays your blog. Blidgets use your blog’s RSS feed to populate into a portable widget that can placed anywhere widgets live. As far as we know, the term was created and popularized by Widgetbox.
Benefit to Marketers: you’ve got a blog, why not a Blidget? Get your content portable and sharable. Services abound to create a Blidget in minutes.

Blogroll: a list of sites displayed in the sidebar of blog, generally for the purposes of advertising who the blogger reads regularly.
Benefit to Marketers: give a shout out, get a shout back.

Branded Games/Entertainment: an online game or entertaining content that is based on, or features your products or brands.  With social media the potential to share games, play on social networks in multi-player environments, share images created from entertainment apps, and create status updates based on game activity abound.
Benefit to Marketers: where do we begin? There’s a massive shift in online marketing to create content to keep brands top of mind. What better way than by entertaining your audience? Some of the most fun casual games and apps have been created by brands, and with the introduction of social media, have much more potential to go viral.

C

Community Building: the process of forming an online community around a common goal, passion or interest utilizing social media’s capacity for sharing text, images, audio and video.
Benefits to Marketers: marketers who create forums for people to connect around their brand while helping facilitate—not control—the conversation will only continue to build brand followers.

Conversation: the threads of exchanges through social network posts, tweets, and blog comments are often referred to as conversations in the context of social media.
Benefits to Marketers: start one, be part of one, have them often.

Crowdsourcing: essentially tapping into a collective of like-minded people to solve a problem or generate content. Popular example: Wikipedia.
Benefit to Marketers: what a great way to inspire conversation around your brand or sponsor a promotion where people are invited to solve a problem.

D

DM: short for “Direct Message” a term used to send a private Tweet from Twitter.
Benefits to Marketers: what, you’re not using the Twitter?

Dave Albert: the president of Emerge Digital, a social media agency that writes this blog. Dave loves feeling smart by helping write glossaries.
Benefits to Marketers: have you seen some of the campaigns Dave’s devised?

Stay tuned for Part II, E-J coming soon…did we miss a term? Leave us a comment below.

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


The new regime in permission-based marketing

I read a post not too long ago about how Seth Godin’s book, “Permission Marketing” had turned 10 years old recently. Not to come off like a soothsayer, but I recall when I first read that book, it completely made sense to me–it was just so natural, so commonsense.

What my 20-something naive head failed to realize at the time was how unnatural and foreign these concepts were to other marketers. The book was eye-opening to say the least.

Our last post talked about how Facebook Fan Pages could very well eclipse brand landing pages and microsites as the leading method way to drive people to an online “home” for  brands. That post, and being reminded of Godin’s landmark book got me thinking about how Fan Pages also fit in so well with opt-in marketing–that permission to be marketed to–to be part of the conversation.

For example, I presently have 1,668 emails sitting in a “to be read” folder in Outlook. These are all email newsletters I’m interested in. I genuinely want to read them, but of course, I rarely find the time. Contrary, I do read my favorite blogs via an RSS reader (mostly now lying in bed with my iPhone). However, if I become a fan of a brand on Facebook, I fully expect the occasional post to show up in my News Feed. In fact, I want it to because I’m that invested in that brand. For example, I love the show “Pitchmen” on Discovery. I became a fan of their page and occasionally Billy Mays (or someone pretending to be him) will shoot out a clip, or when the next episode is going to air.

The posts are short, I can breeze right past em, or click through if I want. And I actually perk up a little when I see a new one. When’s the last time a marketing message did that? Conversely, I would NEVER read an email newsletter sent from the show…Billy, I love ya, but stay out of my inbox.

And yes, I realize this all takes a page from Twitter, but having the posts integrated with the Fan Pages keeps the conversation and the interaction all in one place. I can see it all during my 10 minutes a day of “Facebook time.”

Facebook even announced the ability for people to Become a Fan of your page right from ads you run on the site.

It’s unlikely Mr. Godin could have predicted all the wonderful places permission marketing would go…but we’ll always thank him for getting us started, and continuing to be a thought-leader in the field. Viva La Godin. Viva La Facebook.

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


Facebook: the new home for your brand?

For what seems like eons, though Oceanic Flight 815 was Lost well before, brand marketers and the agencies that represent them have been trying to find effective ways to tap into the Facebook audience. With 200+ million accounts worldwide and 50% of those users hitting the site daily, it doesn’t take much grey matter to see why.

Some firms have only dabbled in social applications, often with less-than-stellar results. (One infamous example was Burger King’s Whopper Sacrifice, which may have received more attention through PR than the application itself.) Clearly, some brands are good candidates for Facebook Apps due to the nature of their brand—such as how they fit into people’s lifestyles or have reached coveted cult-status—and some brands aren’t. (For example, who really wants to interact with toothpaste on Facebook?)

That leaves most brands with the option of advertising on Facebook, or creating Facebook Pages, which essentially provide the ability for them—entities that aren’t “people” per se—to create a presence on the site. While Facebook Pages have existed for some time, until recently they were pretty static—templated and limited in functionality. Back in March, however, Facebook launched an entirely new Pages strategy, making them more like user profiles, and equally important—much more customizable.

This new approach gives brands a greater presence on the premiere social network, and the primary reason to be on Facebook; to connect with others by letting people “Become a Fan” and following the brand through status updates, photo galleries, videos, widgets, apps, links, custom content, and offering the ability for fans to post their own content and comments (brands have some control over this). It’s starting to catch on.

For example, the other day I saw a TV spot for Vitamin Water, specifically advertising their Vitamin Water 10 products. Did they put a URL to the Vitamin Water website on the screen? No, they directed people to their Facebook Pages. (If you’re interested, you can see it at: http://www.facebook.com/vitaminwater10).  I find this move telling, because the actual Vitamin Water site is beautiful. It’s a highly immersive whiz-bang Flash site that Vitamin Water undoubtedly paid handsomely to build—but really, it’s nothing more than an advertisement online. The Vitamin Water Facebook Pages? OK, I have to admit: they’re pretty well done. They could have created some custom pages, and touted their  “Animal Attack” Facebook App a bit more clearly, but the presence is really pretty well thought out—there’s some Flash allowing users to learn about the flavors, watch videos, and do fun stuff. As of this writing they have about 22,000 fans (up from under 20,000 just last week), and seem to be updating their Wall posts fairly regularly with real people actually commenting and rating the posts. (And by “real” I’m assuming not paid agency people or Vitamin Water employees.)

Despite the naysayers, it’s easy to see that people do want to interact with brands on social networks—as long as there’s a story to tell and a reason to share it. While 22,000 Fans might not sound like much for a large consumer-brand, these represent the people who actually thought enough to follow the brand—actual visits to the pages are inevitably much larger. To that end, consider Victoria’s Secret’s PINK Facebook Pages, another consumer brand active on the site, at over 1.2 million fans. Now those are real numbers.

Will Facebook become the new home for brands? Or just a short-term fad? Are Facebook Pages the Golden Ticket to reaching a vast audience sharing and passing along brand info to their friends?

On second thought, maybe I would become a Fan of toothpaste. Aquafresh anyone?

(Note: as of this post, Aquafresh has 396 fans and hasn’t updated their Facebook Pages in what appears to be a little less than a year. Tom’s of Maine is doing much better…)

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.