Emerging Media Demystified. From Upshot Interactive.


Archive for the ‘Customer Intelligence’ Category


Web-based Apps or I ♥ Lando Calrissian

cloud_cityIf you’re a Star Wars nerd (guilty), what probably came to mind when the phrase “cloud computing” came into public use this past year was an image of Cloud City, the floating metropolis governed by Billy Dee Williams (nee Lando Calrissian) in the The Empire Strikes Back (you know, episode two, er, five, of the series). What could be bad about that?

Well, cloud computing isn’t about living in the clouds. It’s about web-based applications—having your computer applications and ultimately your data on somebody’s server out there in (cliché alert) cyberspace so you can access it anywhere you want. And when you put it like that with private companies holding on to your data, the “new hope” people love about Star Wars seems to morph into the darkness of The Matrix or The Terminator. It’s how so many internet-related issues get presented in the media—a battle between access and privacy.

Yet, as the mainstream media fans the flames of that debate to bump up circulation/ratings, the online community, both public and private has moved toward demanding (and providing) greater and greater access, although what they’re willing to give up to get that access remains unclear.

The “cloud” was, of course, there at the birth of the Internet where businesses and individuals agreed to offer up their information to hosting facilities and internet service providers. And it has only gotten bigger since then. More and more people use webmail apps as their only email service. Most users have no qualms about loading vast amounts of personal information onto Facebook, Flickr, Twitter, or whatever social networking platform they use. And the granddaddy of them all, Google, offers all of the above: Google Docs (word processing, spreadsheets, presentations and more), Google Calendar (just what you think it is), Gmail (ditto), Picassa (photo sharing/editing), etc., etc., etc.

Many of these applications are incredibly popular and continue to grow at breakneck speed because people enjoy the access. Still, every couple of news cycles, there is a big media storm about some issue of personal privacy or more specifically personal primacy, that is to say “whose rights come first?”, the application’s or the individual’s.

The most recent example of this was Facebook’s rather dismal handling of its revision of their Terms of Service (TOS). Facebook stated that users who used the social networking platform and uploaded pictures, messages, etc. were essentially giving Facebook ownership of that content in perpetuity (even if users cancelled their accounts). When users heard the word “ownership,” thousands of them balked (okay, maybe it was a little stronger than that). Yet Robert Scoble among others didn’t see what the fuss was about. As he blogged on Scobleizer, “If you are uploading your content to, and participating online with, you are giving a HUGE amount of ownership to services that, well, you really don’t control.” Facebook, of course, quickly backed off the new TOS language. Sure they still have tremendous control of everything we upload to the site, but they’re no longer claiming to “own” us and they’re giving us the great platform we want, so we forgive them.

Google, however, hasn’t made that same mistake. They just keep on coming up with services we want. And they keep compiling our information and using it to generate big piles of ad revenue. (Imagine what it will be like when they launch gDrive, an online virtual hard drive where we can store anything and everything we want.) Wisely, Google never explicitly claims “ownership” of our data, which is why we’re still boyfriend/girlfriend. Sure they get to hear all our secrets, but we’re getting what we want out of the deal too. Will Google stay true to their “Don’t Be Evil” mission statement? Who knows?

What we do know is that web-based apps will continue to grow because people want the access. Furthermore, as we become more reliant on mobile apps, we’ll extend our dependence on the distributed web even more. Is there a downside? If there is, it’s listed on those TOS documents so many of us click on without reading when we add an app. For now we’re on cloud nine with Google and most of the other web-based applications. And aside from the occasional hostile takeover by the Empire, what could be better than living among the clouds?

(Disclosure: Emerge creates web-based apps and offers web-hosting services to our clients.)

Hat-tip to Adam Fox for today’s theme. Image from Wookiepedia.

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


Responding To Your Audience: Anxiety or Opportunity?

It’s almost a Pavlovian response. You see Edvard Munch’s “The Scream,” and you think about anxiety, isolation, despair. Not exactly good timey feelings, but ones many people may be experiencing right now. But this isn’t another piece about the down economy. It’s about listening to your brand’s audience and responding in the way that’s most appropriate for your brand and its message which, you might be thinking, sounds a lot like social media. And you’d be right.

Social media’s focus on creating an interactive community of brands and users requires that brands become more attentive to the concerns and feelings of their audience and respond accordingly. That’s not unlike the task of an artist—be he/she painter, performer, graphic designer, etc—albeit in a more low tech way. The artist listens to the pulse of the times (or zeitgeist if you like ten dollar words) and presents his/her work as a reaction to, or even a rejection of, that pulse. Something at which Edvard Munch was rather adept.

The Munch tie-in is an exhibition here at the Chicago Art Institute called Becoming Edvard Munch: Influence, Anxiety, and Myth. The installation presents not only the anxious feelings the Norwegian artist depicts in his work, but also how instrumental he was in fostering the mentally unstable, tortured artist myth people often associate with him. This public perception is perhaps best illustrated by the fact that a painting of “The Scream” was vandalized early on with the words “could only have been painted by a madman.” Yet the public was not the only actor in this story, the artist also played an important part.

Munch channeled his personal misfortunes into his work, including the death of his mother and sister and his ongoing battle with alcoholism. Yet when art critics characterized the painter’s work as decadent, degenerate, and indicative of mental instability, Munch chose to embrace this persona rather than placate the status quo with more conventional efforts. Thereafter the artist delved deeper into this “disturbing” subject matter further establishing his reputation as an “aberrant” artist.

The Norwegian also demonstrated his marketing savvy by capitalizing on the decadent artist myth he helped build around himself. When Berlin’s art association closed Munch’s 1892 exhibition, the sensation it caused greatly increased attendance at the painter’s subsequent exhibitions. Furthermore, since Munch correctly intuited that many of these visitors only wanted to see, and not purchase, these provocative art works, the artist arranged for gallery owners to charge admission to his exhibition—a highly unorthodox practice at the time—that he might profit from the notoriety of his reputation. Munch’s insights into the contemporary art market thus enabled him to position his work in a way that earned him enough money to continue his artistic pursuits without interruption.

Now, perhaps your brand wouldn’t benefit from embracing a public perception that you are decadent, aberrant or insane. We’re not all artists after all. But the simple act of listening to your audience and responding to their impressions and concerns would go a long way toward clearing up any of those misperceptions (It also might not be a bad time to rethink hiring Marilyn Manson’s former PR person).

Another example of responding to the spirit of the times centers around a recent website redesign Emerge did for the propane company Amerigas. Well into the redesign, the country was facing ever greater increases in gas prices, and energy companies were getting a lot of heat. Faced with this situation, Amerigas asked if we could feature the environmentally friendly aspects of propane more prominently.This led us to rework the site with rich natural imagery; deep, primary colors; and crisp, clean copy. Of course, the “Go Green” link didn’t hurt, but the look and layout of the site—the whole user interface—say it much more eloquently than the words do.

Before the days of film, television and sound recording, communal audiences played a much more direct role in creating impressions of art and performance. Now, with the rise of the internet and applications such as twitter, the general populace has taken hold of the reins again. Moreover, they’re not just giving the thumbs up or down on art and culture—the marketplace of ideas, they’re letting their voices be heard about commercial brands and messages as well—the marketplace at large. Though your audience’s opinions may or may not come in the form of a scream, the question is: are you listening?

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


Can I Get This Corporate Jet In a Generic?

jetSeveral economic bubbles ago (or economic downturns, for the glass-half-empty set) there was a huge “no-frills” movement in grocery stores. It featured products called “generics” that were often packaged in plain yellow cans with black lettering or white cans with blue lettering for staples like beer, soda, detergent, rice, etc. The biggest differentiator for all of these products was, of course, price. Packaging was stripped down and stark. There was no expectation that the products inside were any better than the comparable branded goods. They were just cheaper, often a lot cheaper.

Since then, we’ve entered (passed through?) what Daniel Pink in A Whole New Mind calls an era of abundance. The vast availability of goods has made the concept of scarcity unheard of and created a middle-class obsessed with design. It’s why we see Todd Oldham trash cans at Target, Martha Stewart linen sets at K-Mart, and Norma Kamali fashions at Walmart? (Okay, we didn’t know who she was either, 76.5% of us anyway, here’s her bio.) The question now is, will this obsession hold up as the economy continues to contract?

As consumers, we’re cutting back on nonessential spending (sorry Starbucks, we’re brewing our own now). Many of us are also switching from name brand foods to comparable store brands. FYI: store brands are not the same as generics, which you can still find out there (if not, check out the cult classic “Repo Man” and you’ll see tons of them). The quality of store brands is comparable to that of name brands, the big difference being price point. This indicates consumers’ reluctance to retreat from the design-infused lifestyle and self-image they have come to embrace over the past decades. But, as the job cuts come, the choice may no longer be there.

So where does that leave businesses? In a word: jittery. And, no, that’s not the best way to lead a commercial operation. The organizations and brands that will thrive in this economy will be the ones that are bold and creative, the ones that present themselves as invaluable to their audience.

Want to take the bold approach? Consider Cessna, the private/corporate plane company. Their current campaign touts the line “Timidity didn’t get you this far. Why put it in your business plan now?” It’s a great take-the-bull-by-the-horns pitch for executives, Cessna’s target audience. What it doesn’t take into account is the perceptions of the target audience of the executives’ businesses. Conspicuous consumption does not play very well right now, because businesses don’t want to seem insensitive to the many people out there who are hurting.

(Quick note: Please, please, cancel that luxury corporate junket, especially if you’re asking the Feds for a handout.)

However, cutting out the extravagance doesn’t mean you can’t put an emphasis on creativity and style in your brand message. When times get hard, you cut back where you can, but you don’t change who you are. The era of abundance has led consumers to learn to appreciate design to a much greater extent (it’s one of the big allures of Apple: sleek, simple, stylish), and people are not ready to give that up. As a business/brand, you’ve got to ask yourself what your audience is looking for. It may not be all about the bottom line, and even if it is, creativity and design may need to be a part of that bottom line. As your competitors drop their emphasis on creativity, they become ever more generic. The creativity in your campaign will help you stand out from the rest and remain top of mind once the economy turns around. Because it will turn around.

How you emphasize creativity? Check out some of these projects to see how we work design into the mix to enhance client message: Smart Carton (educational and kid friendly), Amerigas (Clean, green and easy to use), Luxor (sexy, exotic, in reach), University of Illinois Chicago Athletics (collegiate, exciting, fun). It’s not plain-wrap, but then most businesses aren’t either.

Disclosure: We are a creative agency, with the emphasis on creative. So what we’re saying here also serves our corporate interests. But it’s something we believe in, deeply.

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


SXSW Live: Life After the iPhone

A pretty subdued crowd is stumbling in for our first session, and one I’ve been looking forward to since the schedule came out. The lights are low, and I think that’s appreciated by most in attendance.

Kate Ryan is the moderator.

Kyle Outlaw – senior UX IA — ave A

Karen – senior UX engineer TellMe
Scott Jenson — nuts. too fast for my early morning typing skills.

Ok, we’re not here to talk about technical roadmaps. More about iPhone in terms of the landscape and effects in the US and UK — how user experiences may change in the future because of the impact of this product in the market.

First, some fun iPhone facts:

iPhone represents 200 patent filings by Apple

150 million was spent on iPhone development.

Apple’s AT&T negotiation took about a year with AT&T.

AT&T gets five years of exclusivity in the US

Apple built models of human heads to test radiation emissions

The SDK will allow developers to create iPhone Wi-fi phone apps.

Kleiner capital partners just unveiled a $150 million fund for iPhone development projects.

Read the rest of this entry »

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.


SXSW live: what teens want online and on their phones

Jakob Neilsen warned me. He said the worst way to know what really works online is to watch what people do online, not just listening to what they say.

This panel on teens online is a great idea. Until you see a daïs of nervously self-conscious teens mumbling into microphones.

The panel is introducing themselves, MySpace, Facebook, halo3 are consensus winners. The two 12 year olds put in fake ages. All panelists have a favorite niche music site, in addition. One teen panelist differentiated herself by saying she was a regular at seventeen.com, even though she didn’t love it.

Teens agree: ads online suck. Especially disruptive ads.
Only two teens on the panel have Facebook. A good sign for targeting college.

Read the rest of this entry »

If you liked this post, share it:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Print

Visit our main site or check out our social & viral marketing services to learn more about Upshot Interactive. Also, feel free to drop us a line anytime.