Since starting this blog three months ago, I have been reading a lot more other blogs, and trying to learn the medium and its form along the way.
One facet of blogging in particular continues to mystify me: inspiring comments. For the more than twelve thousand visitors to this blog, only a handful of people will take the time to post a comment. Why?
Then at WidgetWebExpo I had the chance to meet David Cushman, who seems to have something insightful and unique to say about almost every medium.
We were talking about commenting in particular when he said that he thought his career as a journalist hampered his ability to evoke comments in blogging, "I’ve been trained to leave no question unanswered."
This led me to think about the difference in narrative structure between traditional mass media forms and Web-based media like blogs or YouTube.
Anytime there’s a place for comments, you’re essentially using a traditional narrative (the post) as your base. As people comment, they become part of the piece, changing the structure and the meaning with their interpretation.
When you look at a blog post or a YouTube or CurrentTV video with no comments, as a user, the meaning of that piece is solely between the creator and yourself. When viewing a post with comments, you take in something different.
The post has gone from a traditional linear narrative to a circular (non-linear) narrative. The communication presented to you is now a combination of multiple viewpoints; you’re creating your own meaning from an ensemble of writers.
The question to creators is how to effectively start that script narrative and entice audience members to participate and shape the final meaning of that piece. Leaving some of the questions unanswered may be the start.
Writers from traditional media backgrounds may have a tough time with this, simply because answering all the questions within the article will always feel to us as what makes the piece complete.
If you liked this post, share it: